Choosing EDI as a Service and TCO

Team Cleo

Please note: This post originally appeared on Extol.com (EXTOL has been acquired by Cleo).

This blog post is the third part of a series highlighting the best practices for EDI as a service in planning and evaluation.

As past entries in this series pointed out, determining whether EDI as a service is right for your business, and which provider solution makes the most sense, requires some careful consideration. Two very important caveats are to be sure to choose a solution based on requirements instead of provider capabilities and approach your selection with a broadened view of the total cost of ownership (TCO).

Pick EDI as a Service for Requirements, Not Provider Capabilities

When EDI-as-a-service offerings initially became available, “on-network translation” were the provided capabilities which hosted on value -added networks (VANs). Data format flexibility was minimal due to limited EDI translation options, where direct integration with enterprise applications and data resources could be offered, but came with a large price tag for the customization.

Present-day options for EDI as a service offer greater flexibility in the following areas:

  • Range of services: May include full lifecycle management, last-mile integration, customized monitoring and other options.
  • Transaction support: Providers may support transformation of XML, flat file and spreadsheet data in addition to standard EDI transaction formats.
  • Last-mile integration: EDI as a service must integrate directly with enterprise applications and data to avoid costly manual processing. To satisfy this last-mile integration requirement, some providers offer adapters and custom integration services.
  • Licensing options: Typically includes fixed-price subscriptions, usage-based subscriptions and hybrid options with perpetual license entitlements.
  • Deployment options: Different providers offer varying methods of how to maintain the EDI-as-a-service system, including hosted or cloud environments. Some also offer on-premise options if security, availability or latency issues are a concern.

In taking time for this analysis before you evaluate service providers, you are providing yourself the most insurance against choosing a solution adding unnecessary cost and complexity.

Better Understand TCO

TCO can include direct and indirect costs you don’t realize while conducting research to find a provider. To avoid missing or misunderstanding a provider’s fee structure and one-time charges, there are a few steps to conduct a complete analysis so you can better understand what your TCO will be:

  • Provisioning charges: One-time charges for account setup, mailbox setup, software licensing and other initial provisioning activities may be assessed.
  • Implementation charges: Last-mile application, data integration, per-transaction and per-partner configuration charges may be costs assessed by specific providers.
  • Recurring fees: Most providers will assess monthly or annual subscription fees varying based on the level of service, which may include per partner/endpoint or per deployed EDI process fees.
  • Usage-based fees: Some models include billable fees based on measured usage, like per-transaction/document or per kilocharacter fees
  • Partner setup fees: These will cover ongoing partner setup costs incurred after the initial implementation.
  • Change fees: Changes to existing EDI processes, new transactions, EDI version updating, and changes to last-mile application and data interfaces are sometimes charged by providers.
  • Exception-handling and error resolution fees: These fees are typically assessed per-incident and cover the cost of diagnosing and handling out-of-band exceptions.
  • Early termination fees: If you end an engagement before the agreement ends, some terms require payment of an early termination fee.
  • Indirect costs: Sometimes the cost of supplemental solutions or processes needed to satisfy requirements that are not met by your EDI service provider, such as incomplete support for required partner transactions.
  • Switching costs: This may mean losing your EDI implementation investment when you are moving to a new EDI service or self-managed arrangement, unless your provider offers a bridge plan to the new solution.

Overall, understanding the need to select EDI as a service based on your company requirements and making sure you understand a provider’s TCO will help you make a better-educated decision when looking to change your EDI provider structure.

CIC Platform Page
Best-Kept Secrets to B2B Integration Success GUIDE
How to Gain B2B Integration Control

One of the most efficient and effective ways to improve communication in 2023 is through B2B integration. And while there are plenty of B2B integration platforms and solutions on the market, a large majority of them fall short in one key area — giving you control.

Your B2B Integration Strategy is Broken

If you can't support end-to-end API & EDI integration or if onboarding partners and customers is painful.... your B2B integration is broken.  Here's what to do about it.

Demo Video Library

Instantly access our library of demo videos to see how Cleo Integration Cloud handles all EDI, non-EDI and API integration use cases.

Mohawk Global Logistics

Mohawk Global Logistics cut EDI costs by $60K a year with Cleo. Here's their success story.